[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims & Scopes
Journal News
cope
ISC
Release license
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Social Network Membership
Linkedin
Researchgate
..
Indexing Databases
..
DOI
کلیک کنید
..
ِDOR
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 4 (11-2022) ::
ieijqp 2022, 11(4): 1-14 Back to browse issues page
Modeling the Knowledge Areas of Project Management in the Project-Based Organizations of Electrical Industry Using DEMATEL Technique
Seyyed Ali Delbari * 1, Seyed Alireza Davoodi2 , Mohammad Shamani3
1- Department of Management, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran.
2- Department of Mathematics, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran.
3- Department of Management, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran
Abstract:   (1111 Views)

At present, projectification has become a common approach in management science and many organizations in the electric industry are project-based. However, there is no comprehensive model to evaluate and improve project management performance in project-based organizations in the electric industry. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to identify the knowledge areas of project management in project-based organizations in the electric industry and determine the causal relationships among them with a model using the DEMATEL technique. The present research was an explorative-descriptive study whose statistical population consisted of managers and officers with bachelor’s degrees and more than five years of experience that worked in project-based organizations in the electric industry, including syndicates, manufacturers, suppliers, and consultant and contractor companies. The sampling method of the research was the snowballing and purposive techniques, and the sample size was equal to 20 experts. The data collection instrument was a questionnaire whose validity and reliability were confirmed using the content validity index and threshold value mechanism, respectively. To analyze data, the managers and officers were initially asked to determine the importance of project management knowledge areas using a 3-point Lawshe scale. Then, the content validity ratio of project management knowledge areas was calculated and with respect to the number of experts, i.e., 20 people, those project management knowledge areas with a content validity ratio of more than 0.42 were selected as the final knowledge areas of project management. Thereafter, the DEMATEL technique was used to design the Network Relation Map (NRM) of project management knowledge areas. Based on the results, 13 knowledge areas were identified for project management in project-based organizations in the electric industry. On the other hand, the results indicated that the areas of cost management, strategic management, human resource management, time management, and quality management had the most interaction with other areas. Furthermore, the results revealed that the areas of governance and leadership management, strategic management, human resource management, communication and stakeholder management, procurement and outsourcing management, inventories and technologies management, and information protection, safety, and health management were casual areas and integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality management, and risk management were effect areas.  The findings provide a clear road map for managers to focus their efforts on the most important knowledge areas of project management in order to enhance the performance of project-based organizations in the electric industry effectively and efficiently.
 
Keywords: Project Management, Knowledge Areas of Project Management, Project-Based Organizations, Electric Industry, DEMATEL Technique
Full-Text [PDF 1170 kb]   (249 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2022/03/26 | Accepted: 2023/01/16 | Published: 2023/02/22
References
1. Abdul Rasid, S. Z., Wan Ismail, W. K., Mohammad, N. H., & Long, C. S. (2014). Assessing adoption of project management knowledge areas and maturity level: Case study of a public agency in Malaysia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(2), 264-271. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000200]
2. Ardimento, P., Boffoli, N., Caivano, D., & Cimitile, M. (2011). Towards Knowledge Based Risk Management Approach in Software Projects. In Risk Management Trends. IntechOpen. [DOI:10.5772/16377]
3. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342. [DOI:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6]
4. Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., & Thuillier, D. (2008). Organisational project management: An historical approach to the study of PMOs. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 38-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.009]
5. Bryde, D. J. (2005). Methods for managing different perspectives of project success. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 119-131. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00438.x]
6. Chadwick, B. A., Bahr, H. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (1984). Social science research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Cicmil, S., Hodgson, D., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2009). Project management behind the façade. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 9(2), 78-92.
8. Clegg, S., & Courpasson, D. (2004). Political hybrids: Tocquevillean views on project organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 525-547. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00443.x]
9. Gill, R. (2002). Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Euro. Information, Communication & Society, 5(1), 70-89. [DOI:10.1080/13691180110117668]
10. Hietajärvi, A. M., & Aaltonen, K. (2018). The formation of a collaborative project identity in an infrastructure alliance project. Construction Management and Economics, 36(1), 1-21. [DOI:10.1080/01446193.2017.1315149]
11. Hodgson, D. (2002). Disciplining the professional: The case of project management. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 803-821. [DOI:10.1111/1467-6486.00312]
12. Hodgson, D. E. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11(1), 81-100. [DOI:10.1177/1350508404039659]
13. International Project Management Association. (2006). ICB-IPMA competence baseline version 3.0. International Project Management Association, Nijkerk.
14. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance. John Wiley & Sons. [DOI:10.1002/9781119427599]
15. Kuura, A. (2020). 25 Years of projectification research. Project Management Development-Practice and Perspectives, 23, 20.
16. Lee, C. Y., Chong, H. Y., Liao, P. C., & Wang, X. (2018). Critical review of social network analysis applications in complex project management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(2), 04017061. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000579]
17. Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2006). What's new in new forms of organizing? On the construction of gender in project‐based work. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 841-866. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00613.x]
18. Lundin, R. A. (2016). Project society: Paths and challenges. Project Management Journal, 47(4), 7-15. [DOI:10.1177/875697281604700402]
19. Machado, F., & Martes, C. D. (2015). Project management success: A bibliometric analysis. Revista de Gestão e Projetos-GeP, 6(1), 28-44. [DOI:10.5585/gep.v6i1.310]
20. Mahmoudi, A., Javed, S. A., Liu, S., & Deng, X. (2020). Distinguishing coefficient driven sensitivity analysis of GRA model for intelligent decisions: Application in project management. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(3), 621-641. [DOI:10.3846/tede.2020.11890]
21. Maylor, H. (2001). Beyond the Gantt chart: Project management moving on. European Management Journal, 19(1), 92-100. [DOI:10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00074-8]
22. Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663-674. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014]
23. McGrath, J., & Košťálová, J. (2020). Project management trends and new challenges 2020+. Hradec Economic Days. Vol. 10. Part 1. [DOI:10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-061]
24. Muller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2001). The impact of performance in project management knowledge areas on earned value results in information technology projects. In Project Management: International Project Management Journal, Project Management Association Finland, Norwegian Project Management Forum (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 44-51).
25. Müller, R., Zhai, L., Wang, A., & Shao, J. (2016). A framework for governance of projects: Governmentality, governance structure and projectification. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 957-969. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.002]
26. Ngo, J., & Hwang, B. G. (2022). Critical Project Management knowledge and skills for managing projects with smart technologies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(6), 05022013. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001095]
27. Office of Government Commerce. (2005), Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, The Stationary Office (TSO), London.
28. Peric, M., Tomino, A. C., Barac-Miftarevic, S., & Mekinc, J. (2021). Review and Analysis of Project Management Knowledge Areas in the Contemporary Literature. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(6), 1-15.
29. Pollack, J., Helm, J., & Adler, D. (2018). What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 527-547. [DOI:10.1108/IJMPB-09-2017-0107]
30. Project Management Institute. (2008), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.
31. Project Management Institute. (2014). PMI's Pulse of the Profession: The High Cost of Low Performance. eNew York New York: Project Management Institute. PMI.
32. Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA.
33. Project Management Institute. )2013(. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 5th ed. PMI Publications, Newtown Square, PA.
34. Radujković, M. (2014). Project management and its impact on society in 21st century. Keynote lecture. Seminario Internacional Direccion de Proyectos Desafious Actuales y futures.
35. Radujković, M., Matuhina, S., & Novak, I. (2021). Phenomenon of projectification and the impact on the national economy-case of Croatia. Poslovna Izvrsnost, 15(2), 9-21. [DOI:10.22598/pi-be/2021.15.2.9]
36. Ribeiro, P., Paiva, A., Varajão, J., & Dominguez, C. (2013). Success evaluation factors in construction project management - some evidence from medium and large Portuguese companies. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(4), 603-609. [DOI:10.1007/s12205-013-0019-4]
37. Schoper, Y. G., Wald, A., Ingason, H. T., & Fridgeirsson, T. V. (2018). Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 71-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008]
38. Shaqour, E. N. (2022). The role of implementing BIM applications in enhancing project management knowledge areas in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1), 101509. [DOI:10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.023]
39. Smyth, H. J., & Morris, P. W. (2007). An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: Methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 423-436. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.006]
40. Söderlund, J. (2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153-176. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00290.x]
41. Söderlund, J., & Tell, F. (2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950-2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 101-112. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.010]
42. Wagner, R. F., & Radujković, M. (2022). Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 14(1), 2559-2570. [DOI:10.2478/otmcj-2022-0002]
43. Wagner, R., Huemann, M., & Radujković, M. (2021). The influence of project management associations on projectification of society-An institutional perspective. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100021. [DOI:10.1016/j.plas.2021.100021]
44. Wawak, S., & Woźniak, K. (2020). Evolution of project management studies in the XXI century. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), 867-888. [DOI:10.1108/IJMPB-01-2020-0002]
45. Westerveld, E. (2003). The Project Excellence Model: Linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 411-418. [DOI:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00112-6]
46. World Bank. (2015). World Bank Indicators. Retrieved 20 August 2021 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.GDI.TOTL.ZS.
47. Wysocki, R. K. (2019). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme, Eighth Edition. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [DOI:10.1002/9781119562757]
48. اصغری زاده، عزت الله. قاسمی، احمدرضا. (1388). مسير تعالي عملکرد زنجيره عرضه: رهيافتي نوآورانه در جهت نيل به مديريت زنجيره عرضه جامع (مطالعه موردي زنجيره عرضه شرکت شهروند). پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 13(52): 124-97.
49. جعفرنژاد چقوشی، احمد. اربابی، هانی. هاتفی، محمد علی. پهلوانی، عبدالکریم. (1399). طراحی مدل ارزیابی بلوغ مدیریت پروژه برای پروژه‌های عظیم صنعت پتروشیمی مناطق آزاد. مجله علوم و فنون دریایی، doi:10.22113/jmst.2020.239023.2386
50. حبیبی، آرش. ایزدیار، صدیقه. سرافرازی، اعظم. (1393)، تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره فازی. رشت: انتشارات کتیبه گیل.
51. رضائی سامان کندی، مسعود، شادنوش، نصرت الله. سهرابی، طهمورث. (1401). چارچوب بررسی و سنجش همسویی قابلیت¬های فناوری نانو با راهبردهای صنعت برق و انرژی با رویکرد ملاحظات ارزشی. نشريه علمي - پژوهشي كيفيت و بهره وري صنعت برق ايران، 11 (2): 25-12.
52. رضائي، كامران. استادي، بختيار. (1380). يكپارچه¬سازي سيستم مديريت كيفيت و مديريت پروژه¬ها با بهره¬گيري از استانداردISO 10006:2003 . دانشكده فني دانشگاه تهران.
53. زارعی، عظیم اله. فیض، داود. رستگار، عباسعلی. صادقپور، حسن. (1398). شناسایی و طراحی مدل عوامل موثر بر اجرای پروژه‌های صنعت برق - مطالعه موردی پروژه‌های دیسپاچینگ شرکت برق منطقه‌ای خراسان. فصلنامه خط¬مشی ¬گذاری عمومی در مدیریت، 10 (34): 86-71.
54. سازمان بین¬المللی استاندارد. (1388). استاندارد بین¬المللی ISO 10006:2003، سیستم¬های مدیریت کیفیت - راهنمایی¬هایی برای مدیریت کیفیت در پروژه¬ها. ترجمه امیدرضا ریاحی. تهران: انتشارات شرکت ملی صنایع پتروشیمی.
55. سروری، هادی. رجائیان، ابراهیم. (1400). ارزیابی اثر بکارگیری استاندارد گستره دانش مدیریت پروژه در بهبود موفقیت مالی پروژه‌های EPC. نشریه مهندسی عمران امیر کبیر، 53 (3): 1240-1223.
56. شاکری، آرنوش. ناصری، حسین. اصولي، سید حسین. صمیمی، محمدرضا. مختار، علیرضا. منوچهری، مسعود. (1388). مدل جامع بلوغ مدیریت پروژه. تهران: انتشارات شرکت ملی صنایع پتروشیمی.
57. شیخ زاده، مهدی. آراستی، محمدرضا. کتب زاده، روزبه. (1390). شناسايی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در بخش بالادستی صنعت نفت و گاز ايران. فصلنامه علوم مديريت ايران، 22 (6): 125-99.
58. صالحي، مصطفي. سعيدي مهرآباد، محمد. سيدحسيني، سيدمحمد. (1388). ارايه يك مدل براي ارزيابي مديريت پروژه¬هاي ساخت قطعات خودرو و بررسي نتايج حاصل از به كارگيري آن. نشريه بين¬المللي مهندسي صنايع و مديريت توليد، 2 (22): 43-31.
59. علیرضائی، محمد رضا. رجبی تنها، معصومه. (1392). اندازه¬گيري رشد بهره¬وري شركت¬هاي برق منطقه¬اي با در نظر گرفتن شرايط تحريم و سياستگذاري¬هاي مربوطه. نشريه علمي - پژوهشي كيفيت و بهره وري صنعت برق ايران، 2 (3): 9-1.
60. کلات پور، امید. بخشی نیا، شیرین. (1393). سناریونویسی براي شرایط اضطراري مبتنی بر رویکرد دانش بدنه مدیریت پروژه. مجله مهندسی بهداشت حرفه¬اي، 1 (4): 48-40.
61. کلاهان، فرهاد. رضایی نیک، ابراهیم. حسنی دوغ آبادی، مرضیه. رمضان پور، حمید. تجدد، امیر رضا. (1394). شناسایی و اولویت¬بندی ریسک¬های پروژه¬های توسعه صنعت برق کشور (مطالعه موردی: حوزه انتقال و فوق توزیع شرکت برق منطقه¬ای خراسان). نشریه مهندسی صنایع، 49 (1): 107-116.
62. کیانیان، فهیمه. شمس قارنه، ناصر. (1392). عوامل موثر بر رضايت شغلي سازمان¬ها - مطالعه موردي پژوهشگاه نيرو. نشريه علمي - پژوهشي كيفيت و بهره وري صنعت برق ايران، 2 (3): 64-58.
63. مولائی هشجین، نصرالله. فروتن، زهرا. (1400). ارزیابی مدیریت پروژه¬های اجرای طرح¬های هادی روستایی با روش PMBOK در غرب استان گیلان. فصلنامه علمی برنامه¬ریزی منطقه¬ای، 11 (41): 52-37.
64. نوروزی، محمد. عاشری، محمد رضا. بلادیان، سید مصطفی. (1394). عوامل حیاتی موفقیت در پیاده¬سازي پروژه¬هاي مشارکت عمومی- خصوصی در حوزه انرژي جمهوري اسلامی ایران (مورد مطالعه: صنعت برق). نشریه علمی - پژوهشی بهبود مدیریت، 9 (3): 108-83.
65. هاتفی، محمد علی. وهاب، محمد مهدی. (1397). استراتژی¬های راهبری پروژه¬های نفت و گاز، مبتنی بر حوزه¬های دانش مدیریت پروژه. پژوهش-هاي مديريت راهبردي، 24 (69): 55-35.

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Delbari S A, Davoodi S A, Shamani M. Modeling the Knowledge Areas of Project Management in the Project-Based Organizations of Electrical Industry Using DEMATEL Technique. ieijqp 2022; 11 (4) :1-14
URL: http://ieijqp.ir/article-1-892-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 4 (11-2022) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علمی- پژوهشی کیفیت و بهره وری صنعت برق ایران Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660