[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Social Network Membership
Linkedin
Researchgate
..
Indexing Databases
..
DOI
کلیک کنید
..
ِDOR
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 4 (11-2020) ::
ieijqp 2020, 9(4): 13-23 Back to browse issues page
Improving Long Run Marginal Cost based Pricing along with Extended Benefit Factor method for Revenue Reconciliation of Transmission Network in Restructured Power System
Alireza Sedaghati *
shahabdanesh univ.
Abstract:   (2866 Views)
Abstract : There are several methods to cover the costs of a transmission system and distribution networks. These methods are divided into either incremental or marginal approaches, which can be either long-term or short-term. The main difference between the incremental and marginal approach is how to calculate the cost of using the network. In the incremental approach, simulation and in the marginal approach, cost sensitivity analysis methods are used to determine the cost. If the tariff is based on the optimal nodal or regional prices, that is a short-term approach, then it only considers the existing equipment. Unless cost optimization is combined with network design optimization. Since the nodal pricing principle is to generate the economic signal, the tariff does not cover the entire network cost. Long-run incremental or marginal approaches can be used to create incentives for future investment. In this paper, a long-run marginal approach has been modified to create the economic signal for the future investment, which can show the effect of power injections on the buses over the long-term costs of the network reinforcement. At the same time, since the marginal approach does not cover the full cost of the network, extended benefit factor method have also been used to compensate for the lack of income. A practical distribution network is used to illustrate the theoretical and practical principles of the proposed solution. Results are compared for different system conditions. The results show that the price of the proposed solution involves not only the future development costs of the network but also the distance between production and consumption and shows the factors that affect network tariffs.
Keywords: transmission tariff, restructured power system, long run marginal cost, long run incremental cost, revenue reconciliation
Full-Text [PDF 1011 kb]   (800 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2019/07/27 | Accepted: 2020/04/27 | Published: 2020/12/2
References
1. [1] Shirmohammadi, D., "Some fundamental, technical concepts about cost based transmission pricing", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 1002-1008, May 1996. [DOI:10.1109/59.496187]
2. [2] Jing, Z., "Review of transmission fixed costs allocation methods", In Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. General Meeting, Toronto, Canada, pp. 2585-2592, Jul. 13-17, 2003.
3. [3] Lai, L. L., "Power system restructuring and deregulation: trading, performance and Information Technology", John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2001. [DOI:10.1002/0470846119]
4. [4] Willis, H. L., Philipson, L., "Understanding Electric Utility and De-regulation", 2016.
5. [5] Perez-Arriaga, I. J., Rudnick, H., Stadlin, W. O., "International Power System transmission open access experience", Power Systems, IEEE Transactions On,Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 554-564, 1995. [DOI:10.1109/59.373982]
6. [6] Marangon Lima, L. M., Marangon Lima, J. W., "Invested Related Pricing for Transmission Use: Drawbacks and Improvements in Brazil", Power Tech, 2007 IEEE Lausanne, pp. 887-910, 2007. [DOI:10.1109/PCT.2007.4538450]
7. [7] Shirmohammadi, D., "Cost of transmission transactions: An introduction", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 1006-1016, Aug. 1991. [DOI:10.1109/59.119240]
8. [8] Marangon Lima, J. W., Oliverira, E. J., "The long-term impact of transmission pricing", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1514-1520, Nov. 1998. [DOI:10.1109/59.736299]
9. [9] Ponce De Leao, M. T., Saraiva, J. T., "Solvin the revenue reconciliation problem of distribution network providers using long-term marginal prices", IEEE Power Eng. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 55-55, 2002. [DOI:10.1109/MPER.2002.4311814]
10. [10] Li, F., "Long-run marginal cost pricing based on network spare capacity", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 885-886, May 2007. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.894849]
11. [11] Rubio-Oderiz, F. J., Perez-Arriaga, I. J., "Marginal pricing of transmission services: A comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 448-454, Feb. 2000. [DOI:10.1109/59.852158]
12. [12] Li, F., Tolley, D. L., "Long-Run Incremental Cost Pricing Based on Unused Capacity", Power System, IEEE Trans on, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 1683-1689, 2007. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.908469]
13. [13] Wang , J., "Lon- run marginal cost pricing methodologies in open access electricity networks", PhD: University of Bath, 2007.
14. [14] Heng, H. Y., Li, F., "Literature review of long- run marginal cost pricing and long- run incremental cost pricing", In Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2007. UPEC 2007. pp. 73-77, 2007. [DOI:10.1109/UPEC.2007.4468923]
15. [15] Gu, C., Li, F., "Sensitivity analysis of Long-run incremental charge based on analytical approach", In Electricity Distribution - Part1, 2009. CIRED 2009. 20th International Conference and Exhibition on, pp. 1-5, 2009.
16. [16] Kovacs, R. R., Leverett, A. L., "A load flow based method for calculating embedded, incremental and marginal cost of transmission capacity", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 272-278, Feb., 1994. [DOI:10.1109/59.317601]
17. [17] Limpasuwan, T., Tipmabutr, S., "Comparison in varied aspects of transmission pricing used on long run average incremental cost", In Proc. IEEE/PES Asia Pacific Transmission and Distribution Conf. Exhib., pp. 1990-1995, 2002.
18. [18] Bakirtzis, A., "Comparison of two methods for long-run marginal cost-based transmission use-of-system pricing", Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Gen., Transm., Distrib., Vol. 148, No. 5, pp. 477-481, Sep., 2001. [DOI:10.1049/ip-gtd:20010408]
19. [19] Méndez, V. H., "Impact of distributed generation on distribution investment deferral", Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 244-252, 2006. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2005.11.016]
20. [20] Sotkiewicz, P. M., Vignolo, J. M., "Allocation of fixed costs in distribution networks with distributed generation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 639-652, May 2006. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873112]
21. [21] Pan, J., "Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 1218-1224, Nov., 2000. [DOI:10.1109/59.898093]
22. [22] Li, F., Tolley, D. L., "Long-run incremental cost pricing based on unused capacity", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 1683-1689, Nov., 2007. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.908469]
23. [23] Chenghong Gu, Furong Li, "Long-Run Marginal Cost Pricing Based on Analytical Method for Revenue Reconciliation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 26, No. 1, Feb. 2011. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2047278]
24. [24] National Grid. Electricity Ten-Year Statement, M. T., 2013.
25. [25] Sedaghati, A., "Cost of Transmission System usage based on an economic measure", IEEE Trans on power system, Vol. 21, No. 2, May 2006. [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873133]
26. [26] Ponce De Leao, Saraiva, J. T., "Solving the Revenue Reconciliation Problem of Distribution Network Providers Using Long- Term Marginal Prices", Power Engineering Review, IEEE, Vol. 22, pp. 55-55, 2012. [DOI:10.1109/MPER.2002.4311814]
27. [27] Kim, H., Baughman, M. L., "The economic efficiency impacts of alternatives for revenue reconciliation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1129-1135, Aug., 1997. [DOI:10.1109/59.630452]



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sedaghati A. Improving Long Run Marginal Cost based Pricing along with Extended Benefit Factor method for Revenue Reconciliation of Transmission Network in Restructured Power System. ieijqp 2020; 9 (4) :13-23
URL: http://ieijqp.ir/article-1-655-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 4 (11-2020) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علمی- پژوهشی کیفیت و بهره وری صنعت برق ایران Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4704